I seriously considered just keep going like this and allow only my rational me to deal with numbers and a couple of facts, carefully avoid the media and definitely stay away from REALLY thinking of those 20 dead children and their teachers. These little boys and girls were not much older than my niece curious for life and full of trust (one of the most impressing magic powers children have).
But is that what I have a blog for? Saying nothing while an opinion is building in my head and heart? Probably not.
In the last couple of days there were a lot of people who said, that topics related to this shooting should not be discussed while everybody is so emotional. I think, excuse me, this is bullshit. 20 children age 5 to 7 and half a dozen of adults, who tried to protect them, died. And oh yes .... this IS emotional and will always be and if not we are doomed to hell. And when do we want to raise the issues attached to this? When people start to move on and forget? Or when it happens the next time? NO, we need to do it now while we feel the pain.
Then there is a group who would like to leave the gun control topic behind and focus on the mental illness part of the problem. I partly agree. Mental illness is one of the root causes of tragedies like this. And there is a severe problem in the USA with the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnes as well as health care that needs to be solved, because these families need HELP. Urgently. For more on this topic you can read this courageous blog post of a mother who's son has a mental health issue and severe problems to control his aggressions.
While we do not know for sure yet if the shooter had similar problems like the boy in the blog post I noticed a big difference between the two mothers: While one desperatly tries to keep her son away from all weapons the other, the mother of the Newtown shooter, was an avid gun collector. Her son had just to cherry pick from what was accessible for him at his own home including the Bushmaster .233 - a semi-automatic assault rifle modelled after a M-16 - he used to kill.
And now please tell me ONE SINGLE RATIONAL REASON, why a mom, a lady living in a 500,000 $ home in a wealthy and safe neighborhood in a quiet and peaceful town needs a semi-automatic killing machine? I will tell you how many reasons there are for this: ZERO!
Security in your home? Are you awaiting a foreign armee or a terrorist attack in your living room or what? This is ridiculous. And because this is an opinion piece, I can tell you my opinion: guns like this should not be legally accessible for any private person. Period.
But let's have a closer look at the situation:
The 2nd ammendment was ratified in 1791, when guns looked like this and while you click that link do not just look at the rifle but also read the post, because I agree with the author about the fact that the 2nd ammendment in the form it now exists is outdated and need to be revised. And NO, it is not untouchable. This is not a rule from god (and even if - who's god in this multi-religious country would that be?), but from the citizens of the USA. Legislation is an essential part of the democratic process and it is equally essential that this democratic process is used to ammend and rework the rules of living together if necessary and I am convinced in this case it is. It's overdue.
The usual argument when a statement like this comes from a foreigner living in a country with stricter gun control like Germany is, that we do not understand how important the right to own guns is for a lot of Americans.
Well, let me update you a bit about German gun culture:
In the beginning gun control was, when it was implemented, not our idea, but the Allies made sure - and who could blame them - that after two World Wars the German nation would go "unarmed" into the second half of the 20th century although we are not SO unarmed now.
Still while I HATED IT to shoot and touch a gun and have no desire to do it ever again, lots of people here feel differently. 2 million marksmen are members of rifle clubs and organisations and every single village has a yearly, very popular event to find the new champion marksman. We also have hunters and people who claim the right to wear a gun for self protection (but the rules for this are very strict) or business (security, bodyguards, etc). We have around 80 million citizens and 10 million registered guns. This is by far not a gun free country full of pacifists.
BUT - here is the big difference: You cannot go into a shop and simply buy a gun. You need to go through several knowledge and aptitude tests including a health status and clean records for mental illness and of course criminal activity. You will have a gunholder pass and need - if your gun is at your home - special, secure lockers. There will be also checks after 3 years or less if the gunholder permission should be suspended or not. No permission is given without naming and proofing the exact need to own a gun.
Guns are - to summarize - much less accessible than they are in the US and only a very small minority of gunholders is allowed to actually wear the gun in public for self defence.
Does this completely solve the problem of criminal violence and illegal gun ownership? No.
Does this legal situation gives us a 100% protection against a shooting rampage like the nightmare of Newtown? No.
BUT I am convinced the high effort that is needed to either legally or illegaly (money, contacts, criminal energy) aquire a gun lowers significantly the likeliness that a potentially mad gunman could get those deadly weapons in his hands. In fact fatal rampages like the one in Newtown are very, very rare events over here.
Additionally I am also convinced that it is important to change the mindset in the Unites States and gun control - removing the guns - especially assault rifles - from the shelfs of the shops as an easy to get consumer good - is a big part of this. It has to STOP being something totally normal to shoot a gun, it has to STOP being a realistic, easy to achieve option to deal with a situation. It needs to become what it really is: a life threatening event.
I wish the families who lost their beloved children and family members that they will able to find some peace. I think that is the best we can hope for. For the children and their teachers I am not worried, because I strongly believe that they were welcomed with open arms at a much better place than ours.
In the name of these children let's work together to make this world - and not just in our own cities, our own country but in general - a safer place.
PS: The name of the shooter and his family was avoided intentionally. Attention and fame - even if it is posthum - are often part of the motivation for those crimes. We should not feed this.